|
Lossy or Lossless? Please use this forum to post spectral and frequency analysis posts about shows you have your doubts about. |
|
Thread Tools |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
Here the 3 sec. slice.
No members have liked this post.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
Quote:
from what i can see, this **seems** to be an analogue FM recording, which according to our standards here at TTD would be acceptable to torrent...however, we're talking about an artist that uses samples for his beats, which can cause different results compared to a typical recording of acoustic or "traditional" instruments... but i don't have as much experience when it comes to european FM feeds, so if i were you i would wait to get a more definitive answer from a few of the ABT mods [jameskg, dcbullet, Five] or one of the other resident experts such as ssamadhi just a fwiw, but we [TTD Staff] don't get paid for this, have busy lives outside of the internet, etc -- so you might want to be a bit more patient when asking for opinions/help, otherwise you come off as an arrogant ass...to properly analyze a SA for lossy/lossless purposes, it helps to be able to see the sample in a few different time lengths, which is why jameskg was asking for a different sample length [and Five would've asked for the same thing ]...again, i just say this as a fwiw, you can say/act however you want really, just don't be surprised if no one helps you No members have liked this post.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
Quote:
I actually might do know why the sound sample I sent you didn't decode/open: possibly because of I closed the upload window before the upload was "ready". Yup. I do understand the rest of your statements about conduct etc. Never, ever been in this kind of a situation before, though I've been a member of various sites like TTD before. But that discussion don't really belong right here in this forum. BTW: Why did you pull off Misfits? In just curious. That's all. No members have liked this post.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
Them shortenings once again! What does "fwiw" mean?
No members have liked this post.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
Right! For What It's Worth = fwiw. Thanks for Wikipedia
No members have liked this post.
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
For What It's Worth
No members have liked this post.
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
i'm a giver
No members have liked this post.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
Quote:
BTW. Listening to right now Bad Brains: Build A Nation. No members have liked this post.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
looks like a regular fm, good source to me
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Gnarls Barkley's spectral view
Quote:
Thanks for your reply! No members have liked this post.
|
The Traders' Den |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
How about sending you a spectral view image before seeding the actual gig? - xcv111 | Technobabble | 6 | 2007-11-16 05:35 PM | |
Line at 15.5 on Spectral View - sourced from ? - vanark | Lossy or Lossless? | 17 | 2005-08-23 02:35 PM | |
EAC Spectral view. - range_hood | Technobabble | 3 | 2005-08-03 11:30 PM | |
Strange spectral view - irishcrazy2005 | Technobabble | 12 | 2005-01-14 06:53 PM |
Thread Tools | |
|
|