|
|
| Technobabble Post your general Need for Help questions here.
• Lossy or Lossless? Moderators |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
2005-06-07, 10:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
which source is better??
source 1 (show split into 16 tracks):
Source: radio station satellite feed > Tascam DA-30mkii > Audiomedia III > PowerMacG4 > Pro Tools CD > SHN via Plextor 12x4x32 source 2 (show split into 14 tracks): Source: pre-FM SBD/AUD Matrix > DAT > CDR > SHN this is from the u2 show at Irving Plaza 2000-12-05 4 questions: 1. Does anybody know which source is better?? 2. Would either be allowed on this tracker?? 3. Is source 1 pre FM?? 4. I have source 2, if source 1 is better, does anobody have it to seed here (or on U2torrents if its not allowed here)?? No members have liked this post.
|
|
#2
2005-06-07, 11:07 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which source is better??
looks to me like both initial sources may be the same. if the source 1 taper had the DA-30 at the station pulling the satellite feed before it was broadcast than its a pre FM just like source 2. If the source 1 taper was at the house recording it than its really just an FM source and source 2 should be the better of the two. If you already have source 2 i would stick with that since the way I see this is at best source 1 is = to source 1.....
__________________
If you want to see a damn good live show check out THIS band. No members have liked this post.
|
|
#3
2005-06-07, 03:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which source is better??
source 1 sounds to me like a post-broadcast recording of satellite radio
(that'd make source 2 better, btw) No members have liked this post.
|
|
#4
2005-06-07, 04:00 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which source is better??
the preFM should be better with more frequency response in the highs
__________________
Checksums Demystified | ask for help in Technobabble thetradersden.org | ttd recommended free software/freeware webring shntool tlh eac foobar2000 spek audacity cdwave vlc Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#5
2005-06-08, 05:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: which source is better??
You would also probably like to know what was done in Protools with the first one. It could have levelled up the show a good bit depending on what was done - it also seems that the tracks were split better. Personally I would go for source 1 as it probably is a better listening experience. But that's just me.
No members have liked this post.
|
|
#6
2005-06-13, 03:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: which source is better??
thanks for the answers, and info.
after this discussion I forgot to upload it until now. It is here: http://www.thetradersden.org/forums/...ead.php?t=8290 from what I was told by users on u2torrents, this is the better version. No members have liked this post.
|
|
| The Traders' Den |
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| The same source ? - Budokan_1982 | Lossy or Lossless? | 5 | 2006-04-14 07:33 AM | |
| Md source? - Moozar | Lossy or Lossless? | 8 | 2006-02-07 05:30 PM | |
| bad source? - spontabmark | Lossy or Lossless? | 10 | 2005-03-27 07:18 PM | |
|
|
