|
Site Announcements & Suggestions This is where you should make your suggestions to us on how to improve your experience here and where to post about site problems/issues.
Moderators |
View Poll Results: Should we ban mindless leechers? | |||
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 1.0 | 27 | 4.03% | |
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 0.75 | 29 | 4.33% | |
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 0.50 | 131 | 19.55% | |
Yes, If their share ratio is less than 0.25 | 158 | 23.58% | |
No, not under any circumstances. Let karma take over! | 201 | 30.00% | |
Give them a warning and allow them to make up for their wrongdoing by ul'ing constantly. | 177 | 26.42% | |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 670. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools |
#151
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
Oh, and for jpc3....
__________________
ABT Seeding Policy | ABT Seeding Guide | VBT Seeding Policy | VBT Seeding Guide Software Links HERE | FAQ is HERE | Technobabble forum is HERE. If your port number is in red, you are firewalled! How to Set Up Your Router (so you aren't firewalled) and How to Port Forward on Windows XP Five's Checksums Demystified - everything and anything you want to know about checksums
On a Mac? Get XLD to rip your CDs. Please see this guide - X Lossless Decoder (XLD): How to create flawless CD rips on Mac OS X No members have liked this post.
|
#152
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Be still my heart. I'll leave every torrent open forever.
No members have liked this post.
|
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
Just my opinion....which is only worth what I might perceive it to be. lol
__________________
I just found out there's no such thing as the real world, it's just a lie I have to rise above....... No members have liked this post.
|
#154
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Well let me clarify. lol
I've used Torrents for awhile, but I never had to actually configure it with a router. The few sites I've used, it just worked. I was never firewalled, except on a boxing torrents site, and there I couldn't figure out what was going on, because everyone on the forum were dicks and wouldn't explain shit to people who were having problems. So now that I've gotten it going, I'm having an easier time uploading.
__________________
Dasani's Ignore List: freezer LeifH12345 Powderfinger TVHeadAssPhuck NEW APPLICANTS ACCEPTED DAILY! No members have liked this post.
|
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
recently i have very seriously considered the notion that members with bad ratios should be forbidden from posting comments.
i think the site should automatically block comments from members until their ratio is 1.0. i see people with appalling ratios whining, criticising, even attacking. i see the same morons doing it again and again. it should be possible to link the member's ability to post comments to their ratio. i think this would be a good thing. these assholes that download but never share back have no right to verbally assault people who take sharing seriously. that's as far as a ban should go. when i discovered (quite by accident) SharingTheGroove.org, well, i can tell you, i downloaded a hell of a lot of shows that i had never been able to trade, and, in fact, a great many shows that i didn't even know existed. obviously, that gave me a trashy ratio to start. but i had the ethic in place, intrinsically, naturally, that i should seed the stuff back. it was no big deal, although it seemed a mountain to climb, building 0.05 up to 1:1.... but it actually was an easy thing in the end. but if i'd been banned, i couldn't have done it. the one thing i knew when my ratio was trash was that i shouldn't attack people that had been sharing on the site for longer than i had, or to better effect. i don't think that high (good) ratios need necessarily create a hierachy, or some kind of 'Club Class'... but i do think that low (bad) ratio users should keep their thoughts to themselves until they have earned the right to criticise. No members have liked this post.
|
#156
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Don't think it's possible at the tracker level to limit download speed, but how about capping the number of simultaneous downloads for new/low ratio members?
Would also help to save some people from themselves when they're new to the candy store.
__________________
(\__/) (='.'=) (")_(") Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#157
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
I understand the idea behind what you're suggesting, and far be it from me to question Jesus Christ, but I think that's going to do more harm than good. True, if you're only here to steal bandwidth by raping the torrents and not giving anything back, yes, you really shouldn't say anything to others that DO. However, not everyone that has a bad ratio is the result of raping torrents. And as for the attacks and all, just from my week (or less) of being here, I've noticed that everyone seems to attack everyone, so you could say they're just fitting in. Everyone is rude to everyone, so it's not like the leecher is standing out.
__________________
Dasani's Ignore List: freezer LeifH12345 Powderfinger TVHeadAssPhuck NEW APPLICANTS ACCEPTED DAILY! No members have liked this post.
|
#158
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
Yeah Jesus, I do wish that those that don't share would just shut up with the rude comments in the torrents. However, it isn't always just those that have low ratios that make the rude comments. There is a difference between making a rude comment and giving constructive criticism and unfortunately, some people have not learned that distinction.
__________________
ABT Seeding Policy | ABT Seeding Guide | VBT Seeding Policy | VBT Seeding Guide Software Links HERE | FAQ is HERE | Technobabble forum is HERE. If your port number is in red, you are firewalled! How to Set Up Your Router (so you aren't firewalled) and How to Port Forward on Windows XP Five's Checksums Demystified - everything and anything you want to know about checksums
On a Mac? Get XLD to rip your CDs. Please see this guide - X Lossless Decoder (XLD): How to create flawless CD rips on Mac OS X No members have liked this post.
|
#159
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
__________________
No members have liked this post.
|
#160
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
lmmfao!!!!!
Nice one freezer....maybe now your ticket to the "pearly" gates is in the mail...heehee.
__________________
I just found out there's no such thing as the real world, it's just a lie I have to rise above....... No members have liked this post.
|
#161
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Speaking for myself, I see far more rude comments coming from the people with "good" ratios. It's like a contest around here to see who can be the first to insult and denigrate anyone who dares to post a marginally-critical comment without a perfect ratio (preferably 10.0 or higher).
No members have liked this post.
|
#162
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
That's the exact mentality that a lot of people have. That's why I'm mostly staying out of the Lounge and just look to help people in other threads in whatever ways I can. I'm too old to deal with stupidity.
__________________
Dasani's Ignore List: freezer LeifH12345 Powderfinger TVHeadAssPhuck NEW APPLICANTS ACCEPTED DAILY! No members have liked this post.
|
#163
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#164
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Yeah...I'm a slow learner sometimes.
__________________
Dasani's Ignore List: freezer LeifH12345 Powderfinger TVHeadAssPhuck NEW APPLICANTS ACCEPTED DAILY! No members have liked this post.
|
#165
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should we ban thoughtless leechers?
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
The Traders' Den |
Tags |
uberleechers |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
The tracker doesn't show leechers for this torrent..SOLVED !!! (tech explanation please..) - pancho1111 | Technobabble | 38 | 2008-03-16 02:28 PM | |
What happened here? 4.294.967.295 Leechers - quadrophenia | Technobabble | 3 | 2008-01-19 01:27 PM |
|
|