|
Technobabble Post your general Need for Help questions here.
• Lossy or Lossless? Moderators |
|
Thread Tools |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Well guygee, at least you didn't rant on endlessly about bootleggers.
Yes I did supply the seeder the FC #21. Yes this is the lineage I supplied: Unknown Mics and/or recorder > Cass(m) played back on JVC TD-W 209 > JVC XL-R5010 stand alone burner (I never give out info on my recorders or mics. I could have told where in each venue the recording was made, as I still have the ticket stubs. I did tell him what I wore to each show, but I've forgotten what I had for dinner on those evenings. ) Yes I recently sent out a package to dorrcoq and he'll be seeding something from me this weekend, I believe. I think he now has lineage supplied this evening. No to Mr wennykelly1: Sorry, I'd rather spend time supplying UNCIRCULATED shows than supplying master copies of already circulating shows to charlatans and frauds who fabricate lineages (RE: PF 4/28/77 and YES 12/1/74). Time to move on, sir. If the best you can get is a unverified lineage bootleg, then everybody has an even playing field. No need to go any further than saying "lineage - unverified generation bootleg" -- now, is there? No members have liked this post.
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
1)Create a database of all shows torrented on Trader's Den, to include info file, seeder, st5/ffp's, date uploaded, size, taper/bootleg title, thread/torrent #. This should be easily searchable on artist/show date, seeder, taper/bootleg title, date uploaded, thread/torrent #. 2)In the future, automatically "tack-on" a torrent file ID to the torrent folder, something like ".TDnnnnn." would be nice. 3) Better, (and I realize this is probably very difficult) auto-generate a small additional info file, something like "[TorrentFolderName]-TDNotes.txt". This should be added to the torrent somehow, and include "Uploaded to Traders Den", DB url, seeder, upload date, torrent ID, size. Maybe this could be accomplished by having seeders fill out a short form before torrenting, but I have to wonder if this would stop certain seeders from posting here (see page 1). Personally, I would vote against anything that discouraged people (especially tapers) from seeding. So whatever is done in this vein better be extremely user-friendly. Let me know what you think, maybe we can take this off-line and talk some tech talk with you and RainDawg in a couple of days, I have a window between semesters after tomorrow. No members have liked this post.
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
Eventually we will sort this mess out and get down to best sources. Etree has that pretty much down pat, and the Zappa and Dylan communities are getting it together. Same with Phish, Pearl Jam, and probably other bands I may not follow much. That is why I am so obsessed with this "versioning" thing, it is the only way to sort out the mess, and it will take years, but it will get done if we provide reliable people with the right tools to do it, like online show information, with versioning and st5/ffp's, etc. No members have liked this post.
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
Yes I am the real Mr. Freezer, got Maytag frost-free stamped on my ass. Quote:
Your ears don't lie to you that half the stuff out there is junk? Now that is a new one on me.... Lineage>junk. I don't see a lot of folks downloading a show with that lineage, do you? The Zappa community is plauged by a giant troll who has been infecting it for years with faulty lineage and mp3s for years. (Anybody wanna make a guess here who I'm referring to?) And the mess he created will be rolling downhill for years to come. And there are collectors who like the mp3 files he torrented. And who will argue with you and flame you over it. The Dylan community bickers amongst itself over easily verified lineage by thriving on bootlegs and sites which tout bootlegs over easy to find low gen tapes. (5/3/76 late show for instance, its only been in the last six months that most of the Dylanites even heard that there were 2 shows on the evening and that the 5/3/76 early show exists as an audience recording.) You are going to have a god-awful time trying to sort this stuff out, simply because of "good traders" or "good seeders" who delight in clouding the waters around certain bands and certain recordings. Without naming the names, there are specific sites whose clientele traffic in bogus lineage and pedigree as coin of the realm. Bet you 10 cents you can name a few.........at least one in particular.......won't take too much presence of mind to do so...... I agree, its always been rooted in the fan vs. archivist arguement, as AAR.oner suggests. However, like I said, I'm much more interested in getting UNCIRCULATED shows out than I am in flogging a dead horse by dragging out a 30+ year old master and circulating another version. When I resurfaced a few years ago, it was because I'd noticed a small group of Led Zeppelin collectors bragging on a certain Yahoo trade group site about just how easy it was to find "master clones" and they were using the 2/28/75 Baton Rouge Led Zeppelin show as their example. Well, I had made that particular master, it had been in storage for 15 years, so I was 100% positive there was no way it had ever been digitally converted from the master tapes. When I remarked on this, one of those so-called "good traders" replied that all I had to do was give him the info on what mics and recorder I'd used so he could make his lineage look better. He was more interested in making his list look better than he was in circulating a true low gen tape. He already had a copy of the tape, now he could just claim he had something he didn't because he would have better lineage. That's the tip of the iceberg you are attempting to climb. But I wish you all the best in your quest, Admiral Byrd......... Go back a few postings on this thread and see what kind of veiled remarks were made about getting upgrades, so bootleggers would find it harder to sell their wares. That fellow wasn't even interested in discussing how to define torrent files or keep proper lineage. He was interested in upgrading his collection. He wasn't interested in getting UNCIRCULATED shows into the trade pool, he didn't even ask what shows I was trying to offer. His whole message was about getting better copies of what is already out there. (I did find someone else to take me up on getting some Brass Band shows from 8/6/05 into circulation.) Do I have a solution to the problem of keeping better lineage with the files? No, but I can do what I've done since I resurfaced. Continue to supply UNCIRCULATED shows only. And leave the stuff that's been bootlegged remain in unverifiable generational form. Yes 12/1/74, PF 4/28/77, LZ 2/28/75, Rolling Stones 6/1/75, Kiss 7/16/74.........they're out there. They're not hoarded. They're just not available as low gen recordings. But the shows are available. Evens the playing field somewhat. Nobody has a low gen of these. Let's move on to some new shows. With proper lineage. That's my preference. No members have liked this post.
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
Why do you want to play with the big boys if you don't want to grow up? How do you think the hobby started? No members have liked this post.
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
__________________
If you want to see a damn good live show check out THIS band. No members have liked this post.
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
I imagine some tapers had rich relatives and came into money, and maybe some live in attics and survive on catfood, and some in between. It just not the life I "fell into". Maybe these are all just poor excuses, you guys are probably right... But at least give collectors their due. Master tapes get ruined, stolen, your house burns down, you die...lucky some collectors saved a copy. No members have liked this post.
|
#39
|
|||||
|
|||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
No members have liked this post.
Last edited by guygee; 2005-08-10 at 06:13 AM. |
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
Do you hear that? It's the sound of the world's smallest violin playing "My Heart Bleeds For You"............. You've smelled up this discussion with some absolutely poor excuses indeed. Try this instead: Tape something off the FM, sneak in that pocket notebook, Mr. Career-Man, shut up and do something about saving some shows for the next generation of "collectors" instead of patting yourself on the back today. "But at least give collectors their due. Master tapes get ruined, stolen, your house burns down, you die...lucky some collectors saved a copy." What bullshit! What the hell do I care what you 'saved'? I did not record any shows solely for you to add to your archives, and I could give a rat's ass what part of my collection survives after I die... guygee, please take this to heart, and I mean this sincerely, ".......and the horse you rode in on......" Cat food.... guygee, you surprise me. With all of the intelligent replies you've made, with all of the positive remarks you postulated, to get this far into the discussion and then to crap out as you've just done.....You need to wake up and smell yourself. Cat food, indeed. And you, Mr. guygee, is your 'career' in "advanced handtruck" maybe? Quote:
Man, you are going to break your arm patting yourself on the back... Quote:
And here I thought you really had something concrete to contribute. No members have liked this post.
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
Anyways, what motivates you to seed your tapes at all? Why bother? After all, you can listen to them yourself whenever you want, right? I did like your collection of "Black Napkins", but I really do not know if there is anything else in your collection I would want. I haven't looked at your list. So I wasn't referring to "me" collecting your shows, but to the general collecting pool. You know, the stuff that will survive after you die? Your life's work? You don't care? I guess you and I just look at things differently. As to what I can contribute beyond "suggestions", it depends on what the folks who run Trader's Den think of my suggestions. Do they want to implement them in some form? If so, maybe I could help. If not, end of discussion. No members have liked this post.
Last edited by guygee; 2005-08-10 at 11:12 AM. |
#42
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
I sincerely doubt that's its the end of the discussion.
No members have liked this post.
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
Your delusions are showing. I speak from a perspective of history in the collector's world, you speak like a computer programmer......... What motivates you to want collectors to follow your 'suggestions', hmmm???? My motivations are part of my inner demons and I very rarely "release" anything you want, so hopefully, we will not have to cross paths again. As for being a superstar, far from it. I never consider anything like that. You haven't looked at my list because you weren't invited to do so. Who told you you deserve to have that right? I haven't seen your list, but I haven't felt the need to do that either. What do you wanna bet that you have shows I recorded on your list? Maybe with bogus lineage? "My life's work?" again I say to you, "......... and the horse you rode in on....." To try to compartmentalize someone who has lived longer than you and done more for YOUR hobby than you are even willing to do smacks of immaturity on you part. However I did notice in this very thread that another, much younger and very prolific taper telling you the same thing; go record some shows yourself. Then your perspective will carry some weight; instead of trying to scale Mount Olympus with your hands full of 'gimme' and your mouth full of 'much obliged'...... As far as the mods and general populace here at TTD go, I expect you'll get the same reaction you've gotten already. Maybe 6 people care, and 1000 couldn't give a good goddam. (As long as they get the show, lineage be damned.) Been there, done that........ No members have liked this post.
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
__________________
If you want to see a damn good live show check out THIS band. No members have liked this post.
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Standards for Naming Torrent Folders
Quote:
__________________
If you want to see a damn good live show check out THIS band. No members have liked this post.
|
The Traders' Den |
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
video-ts-folders help? - shepstar123 | Technobabble | 1 | 2009-03-30 06:30 PM | |
menu ts folders - gigi mcgee | Technobabble | 2 | 2008-02-05 01:43 PM | |
Two shows (folders) on one DVD in Nero? - liberdad | Technobabble | 2 | 2006-05-17 11:05 AM | |
Naming standards - oldbrokentapes | Technobabble | 15 | 2004-11-29 12:57 PM |
|
|